Why Skipping a Reputable Warranty During the Build Stage Is a Risky Move

Why Skipping a Reputable Warranty During the Build Stage Is a Risky Move
When embarking on a property development project, it can be tempting to cut corners and skip obtaining a reputable structural warranty during the build stage. Some developers later opt for a retrospective architects’ certificate as a seemingly convenient alternative.

While this may save time or money initially, it can lead to serious complications, from limited lender acceptance to challenges with property resale. This guide explores why securing a reputable warranty during the build stage is essential and the risks associated with relying on a retrospective certificate.

What Is a Structural Warranty?

A structural warranty is a long-term insurance policy that protects against structural defects in a building, typically for 10 years. It provides peace of mind for homeowners, developers, and lenders by ensuring the property meets high construction standards.

Key Features of a Structural Warranty:

  • Coverage for major structural defects.
  • Often required by mortgage lenders.
  • Ensures accountability for builders and contractors.

What Is a Retrospective Architects’ Certificate?

A retrospective architects’ certificate is a document issued by an architect or surveyor after the build is complete. It certifies that the property was constructed in accordance with building regulations and planning permissions.

Key Features of a Retrospective Certificate:

  • Covers compliance with building standards at the time of inspection.
  • Lacks the comprehensive coverage of a structural warranty.
  • Often limited to a short timeframe, typically 6 years.

Why Relying on a Retrospective Certificate Can Be Risky

1. Limited Lender Acceptance

Many lenders require a reputable structural warranty to approve mortgages on new-build properties. Retrospective certificates often do not meet their criteria, making it harder to secure financing.

Example:

A buyer interested in a newly built property may struggle to obtain a mortgage if the property lacks a recognised structural warranty.

2. Lack of Comprehensive Coverage

While a structural warranty covers major defects for up to 10 years, a retrospective certificate only certifies compliance at the time of inspection. It does not cover latent defects that may emerge later.

Risk:

If a structural defect is discovered after the sale, the new owner may face significant repair costs without recourse to the builder or developer.

3. Resale Challenges

Properties without a reputable warranty are less attractive to buyers, as they face potential difficulties with financing and a lack of protection against defects.

Impact:

The absence of a structural warranty can reduce the property’s market value and prolong the sales process.

4. Higher Long-Term Costs

Skipping a reputable warranty may save money during the build stage, but it can result in higher costs later. Developers may face legal disputes or repair bills for defects not covered by a retrospective certificate.

Example:

A poorly constructed roof develops leaks three years after completion. Without a structural warranty, the owner must bear the full cost of repairs.

Why Securing a Warranty at the Build Stage Is Crucial

Ensures High Construction Standards: A reputable warranty requires regular inspections during the build process, ensuring the property meets rigorous standards and minimising the risk of defects.

Facilitates Mortgage Approvals: Most mortgage lenders recognise and prefer warranties from established providers like NHBC, Premier Guarantee, or LABC.

Enhances Property Value: A structural warranty reassures buyers, making the property more attractive and easier to sell.

Provides Long-Term Protection: Comprehensive coverage for structural defects offers peace of mind to developers, buyers, and lenders.

Example Scenario

Risk of Skipping a Warranty

Situation:

A developer completes a small block of flats without a structural warranty, opting instead for a retrospective architects’ certificate.

Outcome:

  • Buyers struggle to secure mortgages as lenders reject the certificate.
  • The flats remain unsold for months, leading to financial losses for the developer.
  • A defect in the foundation emerges after three years, costing tens of thousands to repair.

Benefit of Securing a Warranty

Situation:

A developer of a similar project obtains a recognised structural warranty at the build stage.

Outcome:

  • Buyers secure mortgages easily, resulting in quicker sales.
  • A defect in the foundation is discovered, but the warranty covers the repair costs, protecting both the developer and the buyers.

Disclaimer Auction Finance provides mortgage advice only and is not authorised to offer legal or construction advice. Please consult a qualified professional for advice on warranties and property standards.

FAQs

Q 1. Why do lenders prefer structural warranties over retrospective certificates?

Ans: Structural warranties provide long-term protection and are widely recognised by lenders, whereas retrospective certificates are limited in coverage and lender acceptance.

Ans: Yes, but you may face challenges, including limited buyer interest and reduced mortgage options.

Ans: The cost varies based on the size and complexity of the project, but it is generally a small percentage of the overall build cost.

Ans: Some providers offer latent defect insurance post-construction, but it is typically more expensive and harder to secure than a warranty obtained during the build stage.

Ans: While not legally required, most mortgage lenders and buyers demand a structural warranty for new-build properties.

Ready to secure your auction success?

Get in touch today and turn your bids into wins!

Start Your Application Now